I would like to congratulate Wave3 for being responsible and not acknowledging this bunk award.
While Bill Lamb at Fox is just gushing over this award without actually checking its credibility, most media outlets and the general public of Louisville seem to know better.
Which points out that even though Louisville is not safer, cleaner, healthier or more economically sound than the other cities nominated for this award, at least the people are starting to see there is a real problem and refuse to take credit where it obviously is not due?
I have yet to see actual numbers presented by this committee during this national mayor’s conference that even begin to prove how Louisville Kentucky can be called the most “livable” city in the US.
The city is more polluted than any of the other cities nominated for this award.
Louisville DEFINITELY has a higher crime rate and poorer health index than Miami and Seattle put together.
I’ve been to Seattle and I did not find one area of that city where it smelled like open sewage 24/7.
It isn’t even plausible that the education system and average IQ in Louisville is even comparable for the fact that it ranks below the national average almost as a constant.
I think the problem is with the name of this award.
Most “livable” is a very lucid term. It sounds like “bestest” or “most improved” so it doesn’t exactly need to encompass anything like an actual record or statistic that would designate that the city actually has a higher standard of living than any of the other cities nominated.
Was the deciding factor one of the tax cuts for rich people in the east end, the most despotic HMO in the world being seated in Louisville or a $90,000 annual salary increase for ONE employee at a learning institution that is hiking tuition, cutting jobs and cutting benefits?
“Life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel.”
-Walpole