Question:
If you were watching Las Vegas while Wave3 interupted the program how would you prefer Wave3 handle the Breaking News?

Choices:
Interupt the Show 30-45 min in advance
I liked the way they handled the breaking news
Why did i have to sit through a summary of what i have heard for years, and interupt my show, break in when the verdict is read!
I Don't care, i am watching Las Vagas i don't want my show completely ruined!

 

I think it was total B-S that they broke in with THIS crap. Talk about beating a dead horse. I was sick of hearing about this trial YEARS ago.

I agree with carrieve.
Also I don't want to listen to speculation of the newscrew. Give the current facts an go on.
With all the hype of Las Vegas moving to Friday nites, the show should have continued in its entirety after all the commentary.
I am very disappointed in WAVE 3's decision to interrupt a popular show so far ahead of having the facts.
Your newscrew are NOT experts and they wasted about 45 minutes of enjoyable airtime. Give me the facts NOT speculation or rehashing.
None of us know all the facts and never will.

I wasn't watching TV when this happened. However, when "breaking news" has pre-empted something I'm interested in watching, it is very irritating. They could just scroll for anyone that really wants to know!
Our news media place a lot of importance on topics that are truly important only to them. A trial verdict can wait til news time as far as I'm concerned.