Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by House Prisoner: The problem is that there is no "Board" or "volunteers", or voting per se.
Dominion has decreed that they are the board (for a period of 30 years), and can arbitrarily implement restrictions without representation from the actual Home Owners that live in the community. (to draw a parallel...no taxation without representation...sound familiar?)
Doesn't sound democratic, does it?
One remedy is to vote them out...may be a next step.
Zoning/Planning/Building Permit departments in the city of Louisville permit up to 8 foot fences.
Dog Ordinance require/permit 6 foot enclosures (fences/cages)?
This is a safety fence in order to preserve the health and welfare of neighbors in the community. It is not a spite fence, a nuisance fence or otherwise.
Who is responsible for protecting their dogs and property and can be held liable? The home owner, not the Association!!!
Last I checked, we live in a Democracy and in the City of Louisville in the good ol' USA!!!
In order to get anything changed, we need to meet with the Dominion, but they have refused to even attend the Home Owner Association meeting or respond to correspondence on the matter...
By the way, fences increase property values (in ground pools for example decrease property values).
Thanks for reading...
Oh yes,we know all about Dominion Homes RUNNING from problems. They were a NO SHOW at our meetings as well.
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by ezscriiibe: MJ:
The point is, it doesn't matter if the neighbors say "doesn't bother me" because the deed covenants say otherwise. Please look up the definition for "covenant."
Those neighbors may not always be the same. People come and go all the time. And if one person has a structure up that is blatantly against what the covenants dictate can be there, then others will figure they can, too, then everyone is getting signatures and no one is actually following the DEED RESTRICTIONS.
They are just as binding as ZONING REGULATIONS. Let's say someone wanted to start a dental business in a neighborhood that Zoning specifically designates as residential only, no commercial. Let's say the DMD gets siggies from 94% of the neighbors that say, "okay by me." Can the Dentist hang out his shingle?! NO!
If he wants to do something against the Zoning, he would need to move to get either the Zoning changed or obtain a conditional use permit.
The same thing applies to a set of Deed Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions.
If a homeowner wants to put up a structure that is forbidden by the Deed Restrictions, his ONLY recourse it to get the Deed Restrictions AMENDED to allow the structure he wants.
All homeowners associations have by-laws or deed restrictions that address the proper way to get the restrictions amended. In MOST cases it requires a certain percentage of all voting residents to approve the amendment. That number can vary anywhere from 51% to 75% to as high as 91%. Only the governing documents for that particular development can specify what that number needed for the amend is to be.
So if this fella REALLY wants his fence and is not just trying to do whatever the heck he wants, then the PROPER way to address it is to get the Deed Restrictions AMENDED to allow 6-foot fences.
How hard is that to figure out?
I don't need you to explain either. My gripes are with Dominion Homes. It's not a secret they are a huge rip off. Try addressing them,it's a waste of time. They love to run from people. Yet like my GRIPE plainly said they have the gonads to SUE anyone when there's many many many people who want to sue them.
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by ezscriiibe: This reply is also addressed to MJ:
The renters still have to follow the deed conditions, covenants, and restrictions.
If they do not, then the owner is notified and he or she is responsibile for whatever penalties will apply, so it would be in the landlord's best interest to make sure his renters adhere to the deed restrictions.
Also, if you don't think your governing board is doing enough to enforce the restrictions, if you want to protect your investment then you should step forward and volunteer to be a member of the board. In that way you can see to it that the enforcement policies are consistent, timely and fair and your investment in your property is protected.
In our 275-resident community, we have maybe 5 residents who consistently receive notices to comply with one restriction or another. The other 270 residents have no problem adhereing to the restrictions that are there for the benefit of them.
The board members have had to bring a litigation against a resident only once in the last 10 years, and that was for illegal dog run, illegal kennel operation and nuisance (3 loud, noisy, and aggressive dogs that he was breeding. Our regulations -- and county ordinance for that matter -- do not allow unlicensed breeding). The homeowners association won and the resident had to remove the dog run and get rid of his dogs.
I guess you missed the part where I said the HOA is UPSIDE down at this point. 13 "We Buy Houses" by ONE owner and NONE of his bills for inside here are paid. Is he in court? Nope and that's why he isn't worried about not paying his dues,..... He told at least one of his renters that I know, to pay them or move out. She said it's not in my lease so I'm not paying anything other than my rent. Hence the renter and we buy houses problem I mentioned.
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by French Toast: quote: Originally posted by *~*M*J*~*: OMG! You've so got to be jigglin' joking???
He polled every available neighbor -- going to minion Homes is actually going to sue anyone????
Why I understand the man's plight, I think he's going to come up short if he tries to fight this. Any poll or petition he got signed by most of his neighbors doesn't matter one little bit. He agreed to abide by the rules of his neighborhood (the home owner's association). He most likely got a copy of these rules when he bought his property. The best advice I can give to perspective home owner's out there is to read HOA rules very, very carefully and realize that HOA operation can change dramatically with the election of a new president or board. HOA's can serve to protect you home's value but they can also wreck havoc with you home tranquility.
Yes Toast,I think he should have gotten proxies in to the HOA "office" so he could proceed,but my gripe is more with Dominion. They are not very liked by many.
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by becan: I live in a high rise condo building with assigned garage parking spaces that are deeded to your unit. I want to sell an extra spot that I own but the Board President informed me that I could not post it on the list in the office because I am not asking the minimum price that the Board has formulated for parking spaces. He further told me that if I wanted to sell my unit, they would expect the "preferred" realtor not to list my unit if they thought I was not "reflecting the market value" by selfishly desiring to sell it at a lower price simply to effect a quick sale. (I have the emails to prove this)
You think you live in an association ruled by a nutball? Come to my place!
I was reading some information from Citifinancial and they have that in there that it's against the law forcing quick sells. I don't know it that pertains to quick sells period or just that specific company.
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2008 WAVE 3 Television
|