Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Angel:He should be charged,with what I dont know,but he played a role in this as well as Parrish did.He had a choice to make and made the wrong one.
Angel: In my opinion They BOTH should be charged with at least Reckless driving and Endangerment. Both are criminal offenses. Traffic violations that involve fines, license suspensions,and required counseling. Mandatory Anger Management courses. The son should be charged with Assault,which is a crime of violence against another person. Required Counseling.
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by *~*M*J*~*: quote: Angel:He should be charged,with what I dont know,but he played a role in this as well as Parrish did.He had a choice to make and made the wrong one.
Angel: In my opinion They BOTH should be charged with at least Reckless driving and Endangerment. Both are criminal offenses. Traffic violations that involve fines, license suspensions,and required counseling. Mandatory Anger Management courses. The son should be charged with Assault,which is a crime of violence against another person. Required Counseling.
My understanding is that police can not write tickets for traffic infractions they do not personally witness. Consequently, neither Ms. Parrish nor Mr. Mossier can be cited for reckless driving even if they did drive recklessly. Likewise, police would be unable to cite either driver for an endangerment charge unless the officer personally witnessed the event. A police officer in writing any traffic citation is essentially swearing that he observed an offense occurring which violates state statutes. If the citation is contested, he must be able to going into a court of law and swear under the penalty of perjury that he or she saw the offense occur. As for Ms. Parrish's son was charged with misdemeanor battery in connection with the case. According to witnesses, he kicked Mr. Mossier as he lay on the ground. Son charged in Jeff road-rage case
My real name is Frenchi Babè.
|
| |
| Posts: 1491 | Location: Right here | Registered: June 29, 2005 |    |
|
Forum Novice II

|
quote: Originally posted by French Toast:
You say that Mosier should be charged yet you readily acknowledge that you have no idea what he could be charged with. Do you know how foolish that sounds???
I've heard no reports that Ms. Parrish ever kicked Mr. Mosier.
I never said that I have a perfect memory,French. And There are 60 pages of this stuff we have been commenting on here,and I dont catch the news that often so I have not kept up with what is going on with this case. Thank you for catching my mistake's. Also, I am not a law professional so I dont know every little thing there is to know about the law and all the criminal charges that can be brought upon a person. But I do know that Mosier ,in my opinion, should have stayed on his bike and went his merry old way and not approached Ms Parrish .But because he did approach her,he should not just get off the hook,there should not be a fine for his stupidity either, butsome sort of charges brought against him . There should be a new law passed that would charge people with being stupid when they do stupid stuff.  There are many a person to die from another's stupid mistake's,many a person to have gotten hurt by another's stupidity.This case is a prime example.  Ms. Parrish could have ran the bike over,backed up,moved in the other lane etc etc. I wasnt there nor have I seen the incident scene so I dont know how the road is laid out. All in all, Moiser did a stupid act and was shot for it. Ms Parrish,for her part in all of this, will maybe face charge's herself. All over something that maybe could have been avoided if one would have been the bigger person and avoided the other person in the first place.
Joshua 24:15,,,but as for me and my house,we will serve the Lord.
|
| |
| Posts: 478 | Location: God`s Green Earth | Registered: March 27, 2003 |    |
|
Forum Regular

|
quote: Originally posted by French Toast: quote: Originally posted by *~*M*J*~*: quote: Angel:He should be charged,with what I dont know,but he played a role in this as well as Parrish did.He had a choice to make and made the wrong one.
Angel: In my opinion They BOTH should be charged with at least Reckless driving and Endangerment. Both are criminal offenses. Traffic violations that involve fines, license suspensions,and required counseling. Mandatory Anger Management courses. The son should be charged with Assault,which is a crime of violence against another person. Required Counseling.
My understanding is that police can not write tickets for traffic infractions they do not personally witness. They do it all the time. Just like they didn't see a fight so there's nothing they can do. HOWEVER when one or more witnesses approach NOT a party to anyone involved then they will handle it. Seen it for myself. Not anything I've heard from someone from someone from someone.Consequently, neither Ms. Parrish nor Mr. Mossier can be cited for reckless driving even if they did drive recklessly. Likewise, police would be unable to cite either driver for an endangerment charge unless the officer personally witnessed the event. A police officer in writing any traffic citation is essentially swearing that he observed an offense occurring which violates state statutes. If the citation is contested, he must be able to going into a court of law and swear under the penalty of perjury that he or she saw the offense occur. As for Ms. Parrish's son was charged with misdemeanor battery in connection with the case. According to witnesses, he kicked Mr. Mossier as he lay on the ground. Son charged in Jeff road-rage case
|
| |
| Posts: 1130 | Location: USA | Registered: August 09, 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© 2008 WAVE 3 Television
|