Originally posted by Phoenix08: You have taken things out of context as usual Frenchy, I explained that I felt Jeffersonville/Clarksville police made Parrish look guilty by trying to revoke her permit before she had her day in court. And if they felt she was a threat to the public she should have been locked up. But they made it public that they were going after her permit.
You're inferring a meaning where no exists. Taking away Yalanda Parrish's weapons permit does not insinuate that Ms. Parrish is guilty. It is only an attempt to protect the public until the rightness or wrongness of Ms. Parrish's actions can be decided by a court of law. Moving to revoke someone's weapons permit is a matter of public record. Attempting to conceal their attempt to revoke Ms. Parrish's weapons permit would have been a violation of the public's right to know. Lastly, Ms. Parrish was booked and released after posting bond. Citizens with documented ties to a community are generally given a chance to post bond (in Indiana) or be released on their own recognizance (in Kentucky).
Posts: 1606 | Location: Right here, right now | Registered: June 29, 2005
As I stated, keep telling yourself that lie if it comforts you. I've been on all of these boards here in Louisville and many were convinced that after the 52 calls to 911 were reported they felt she was guilty. If a black guy was having road rage with your wife and he was calling her the h-word and was spitting on her car. When he reaches a red light he decides to get off his bike and confront your wife are you telling me you would feel she would be wrong to shoot this guy? You would be lying threw your teeth if you said no. How was your wife too know what this mans intentions were? And all threw the altercation Mosier had a hostel demeanor.
Don't start nothing it won't be nothing.
Posts: 96 | Location: Louisville, KY | Registered: June 23, 2008